๐Ÿ”ด Active LMIA Postings Monitor

Real-time tracking of Job Bank LMIA-tagged postings

Data Current as of: Loading...

Data source: Job Bank TFW Section

View Historical Analysis โ†’

Total Applications

0

๐Ÿšซ Known Violators

0

High Risk

0

Very High Risk

0

Flagged

0%

โš ๏ธ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER

This tool provides STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ONLY. High risk scores are NOT accusations of wrongdoing and do not prove fraud or misconduct. All employers should be presumed innocent. Scores indicate patterns that MAY warrant further investigation by authorities. For informational and research purposes only. Verify all information independently.

๐Ÿ“Š Methodology (v4.0 - Active Postings Risk Assessment)

Risk Assessment Score (0-100): Natural scoring model for active LMIA job postings. Higher scores indicate statistical patterns suggesting potential compliance concerns based on wage, skill level, and affordability metrics. Scores naturally sum to 0-100 with optional +5 IRCC violator bonus.

Risk indicators considered (5 core factors):

  • ๐Ÿ†• Wage Premium Analysis (0-40 pts): If employers "can't find anyone," wages should exceed baseline, not meet minimum. At/below median = 40 pts, 1-5% above = 30 pts, 6-10% above = 20 pts, 11-20% above = 10 pts, >20% above = 0 pts
  • Low-Skill Position Penalty (TEER) (0-15 pts): Based on NOC TEER level. TEER 5 = 15 pts, TEER 4 = 10 pts, TEER 3 = 5 pts. Low-skill positions are easiest to train locals for
  • High-Risk Occupation (0-15 pts): Occupations with historically higher exploitation rates (food service, accommodation, cleaning, labour)
  • Affordability Crisis (0-15 pts): Wage must be sufficient to live in work location. Below living wage = 15 pts, monthly income < 1.5x rent = 10 pts, < 2x rent = 5 pts
  • Industry Risk Profile (0-10 pts): Certain industries have documented patterns of TFW program abuse: food service, accommodation, cleaning services, general labour
  • Known IRCC Violator (0-5 pts bonus): Employer appears on IRCC Non-Compliant Employers list. Requires exact employer name + province match for legal defensibility

Total Score: 0-100 points naturally (5 factors sum exactly). Optional +5 IRCC violator bonus applied in enrichment phase. Click any row to see detailed score breakdown. Read full methodology documentation โ†’

Data sources:

๐Ÿ“– Full Methodology
Risk Score Risk Level Status Employer City Province Occupation Wage Offered Expected Wage Min Wage Avg Rent Rent/Income Risk Indicators
โณ Loading LMIA data...
Fetching 49,199 active job postings from government database
Loading chunk 1 of 52...

Legend

Very High Risk (75-100)
High Risk (60-74)
Moderate Risk (40-59)
Low Risk (20-39)
Minimal Risk (0-19)